Title: Iyer’s Popularity Denies Inglis & Wadhera Credit for Win vs MI: Ashwin
The Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025 has been filled with thrilling matches, and the Qualifier 2 between Punjab Kings (PBKS) and Mumbai Indians (MI) was no exception. PBKS emerged victorious, thanks to some outstanding performances from their players. However, according to PBKS spinner Ravichandran Ashwin, the credit for the win has been misdirected towards their captain, Shreyas Iyer, when it should be given to Josh Inglis and Nehal Wadhera.
In an interview with a leading cricket publication, Ashwin opined that Iyer’s popularity has denied the credit that Inglis and Wadhera deserve for PBKS’ win. He stated, “Whenever they needed a boundary, Iyer got it. But the game-changing [batters were Inglis and] Wadhera.” Ashwin’s comments suggest that while Iyer did play a crucial role in PBKS’ victory, it was Inglis and Wadhera who were the real game-changers.
Ashwin’s statement is not surprising, given the dominance that Inglis and Wadhera displayed during the match. Inglis, in particular, had a remarkable outing, playing a 20-run over against Jasprit Bumrah in the powerplay. His aggressive batting style and ability to accelerate the innings were instrumental in PBKS’ victory.
Wadhera, on the other hand, played a more subtle role, but his contributions were equally important. He batted sensibly and rotated the strike well, allowing Inglis to take the attack to the MI bowlers. Wadhera’s batting was particularly impressive, considering that he was facing a strong MI bowling attack.
Ashwin’s comments have sparked a debate about whether Iyer deserves all the credit for PBKS’ win. While Iyer did play a crucial role in the match, it is clear that Inglis and Wadhera were the real heroes. Iyer’s batting was more of a supporting act, rather than the main event.
Ashwin’s opinion is not only justified but also reflects the team’s perspective. In a team sport like cricket, it is essential to recognize and reward the efforts of all players, not just the captain. Inglis and Wadhera’s contributions were invaluable, and they should be recognized as such.
The debate about credit distribution is not new in cricket. In the past, we have seen instances where a single player has taken all the credit for a team’s victory, while other players have been overlooked. Ashwin’s comments serve as a reminder that it is essential to recognize the efforts of all players, regardless of their position or role in the team.
Inglis and Wadhera’s performances against MI have also raised questions about their potential to play for Team India in the future. Ashwin’s statement that they will “see this runaway superstar in Team India soon” suggests that the duo has the potential to excel at the international level.
In conclusion, Ashwin’s comments are a refreshing change in the world of cricket, where credit is often given to the captain or the most flashy player. Inglis and Wadhera’s performances against MI were outstanding, and they deserve recognition for their efforts. As Ashwin said, they will “see this runaway superstar in Team India soon”, and it is essential to recognize their potential and give them the credit they deserve.
