Title: I’m not a Selector: Gambhir on being asked about Iyer’s Omission from Squad for England Tests
In a sharp retort, Team India head coach Gautam Gambhir responded to questions about Shreyas Iyer’s omission from the squad for the five-match Test series against England. When asked about the decision to leave Iyer out of the squad, Gambhir gave a straightforward answer, saying, “I am not a selector.”
Iyer had been in fine form, scoring 480 runs in seven Ranji Trophy innings for Mumbai, with an impressive average of 68.57. However, the selectors chose to overlook him for the Test series against England. Gambhir’s response suggests that he is not willing to get drawn into discussions about the selection process, leaving it to the powers that be to make the decisions.
This is not the first time Gambhir has been asked about selection decisions. As a coach, it is not uncommon for him to be quizzed about the squad and the decisions made by the selectors. However, Gambhir’s response suggests that he is keen to maintain a level of distance from the selection process, focusing instead on preparing the team for the upcoming series.
Iyer’s omission from the squad has sparked debate among cricket fans and experts. Some have questioned the decision, given his impressive form in the Ranji Trophy. Others have pointed out that Iyer has not played a Test match since February 2024, and that the selectors may be looking for players who are more consistent and experienced at the Test level.
Regardless of the reasons behind the decision, Gambhir’s response serves as a reminder that the coach is not responsible for making selection decisions. The coach’s role is to prepare the team and provide guidance to the players, while the selectors are responsible for picking the squad.
Gambhir’s response also highlights the importance of maintaining a clear distinction between the coach’s role and that of the selector. While the coach may have a significant amount of influence over the team and the selection process, ultimately, the decision is made by the selectors.
In the past, there have been instances where coaches have clashed with selectors over selection decisions. However, in Gambhir’s case, it seems that he is willing to respect the selectors’ decisions, even if it means leaving out a player who has been in good form.
Iyer’s omission from the squad is a significant blow to his chances of playing Tests for India in the near future. However, Gambhir’s response suggests that the coach is not willing to get drawn into discussions about the decision, leaving it to the selectors to make their own decisions.
In conclusion, Gambhir’s response to questions about Iyer’s omission from the squad serves as a reminder that the coach is not responsible for making selection decisions. While the coach may have a significant amount of influence over the team and the selection process, ultimately, the decision is made by the selectors. Gambhir’s response suggests that he is willing to respect the selectors’ decisions, even if it means leaving out a player who has been in good form.
