Congress’ Name Should be Changed to ‘Pakistan Parast Party’: BJP
The recent comment by BJP leader Shehzad Poonawalla has sparked a heated debate in the political circles of India. Poonawalla accused the Congress party of speaking Pakistan’s language and suggested that the party should change its name from Indian National Congress (INC) to Pakistan Parast Party (PPP). The BJP leader’s statement was made in reference to the Congress government’s stance on Jammu and Kashmir in the 1960s.
According to Poonawalla, it was surprising that the Congress government of the time wanted to hand over a large part of Jammu and Kashmir to Pakistan under foreign pressure. He described this move as an attack on India’s sovereignty and claimed that it was unacceptable. Poonawalla’s statement has been met with widespread criticism from the Congress party, with many leaders terming it as an attempt to divide the nation.
However, Poonawalla’s comments highlight a long-standing issue that has been plaguing the country. The Congress party’s stance on Jammu and Kashmir has been a subject of controversy, with many questioning its commitment to India’s territorial integrity. The party’s history of appeasement towards Pakistan has raised eyebrows, with many accusing it of prioritizing foreign pressure over national interests.
The 1960s were a tumultuous period in India’s history, marked by the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 and the Tashkent Agreement. The Tashkent Agreement, signed in 1966, aimed to resolve the Kashmir dispute through a ceasefire and the return of captured territories. However, the agreement also included a provision that allowed for the demilitarization of the Kashmir Valley, which many saw as a concession to Pakistan.
The Congress government’s willingness to consider this provision has been criticized by many, including Poonawalla. He has accused the party of being soft on Pakistan and of prioritizing foreign pressure over national interests. This criticism is not unfounded, given the party’s history of appeasement towards Pakistan.
In the 1990s, the Congress government led by P.V. Narasimha Rao was accused of trying to appease Pakistan by agreeing to the Lahore Declaration. The declaration, signed in 1999, aimed to improve relations between India and Pakistan and to resolve outstanding issues through dialogue. However, the declaration was widely criticized for being too soft on Pakistan and for failing to address India’s concerns on terrorism and Kashmir.
The Congress party’s appeasement towards Pakistan has not only damaged its reputation but has also emboldened Pakistan to continue its aggressive behavior towards India. The country’s continued support for terrorism and its refusal to acknowledge India’s sovereignty over Kashmir has made it difficult for India to negotiate with Pakistan in good faith.
Poonawalla’s suggestion that the Congress party change its name to Pakistan Parast Party may seem extreme, but it highlights the need for the party to re-examine its stance on Jammu and Kashmir and its approach towards Pakistan. The party’s history of appeasement has been detrimental to India’s interests and has undermined its credibility as a national party.
In conclusion, Poonawalla’s comments highlight a long-standing issue that has been plaguing India’s political landscape. The Congress party’s stance on Jammu and Kashmir and its approach towards Pakistan have been criticized by many, and it is time for the party to re-examine its policies and priorities. The BJP leader’s suggestion that the party change its name to Pakistan Parast Party may be controversial, but it highlights the need for the party to take a strong stance on national interests and to prioritize India’s sovereignty over foreign pressure.
