Meaningless Optical Exercise: Centre’s On Op Sindoor Delegation
The Centre’s recent move to send delegations abroad on Operation Sindoor has been met with criticism from the Congress party. In a scathing attack, Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh termed the exercise as a “meaningless optical exercise” and demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi call a special session of Parliament to clarify the ceasefire claims made by US President Donald Trump.
The controversy surrounds the Centre’s decision to send delegations of opposition parties, including the Congress, to various countries to brief them on Operation Sindoor, a supposed ceasefire agreement between the Indian and Pakistani armies. However, the opposition parties have been skeptical about the authenticity of the agreement and have questioned the Centre’s motives behind sending them abroad.
Jairam Ramesh, in a statement, said that the sending of these delegations is part of a “weapons of mass destruction (WMD) exercise” and that the Centre is trying to distract the nation from real issues. He further added that the Centre’s move is an attempt to create a fake narrative and that the opposition parties are being taken for a ride.
The controversy has sparked off a heated debate in the country, with many questioning the Centre’s intention behind sending the delegations abroad. While the Centre claims that the exercise is aimed at strengthening international relations and promoting peace, the opposition parties believe that it is a ploy to divert attention from the real issues plaguing the country.
The Congress party has been at the forefront of the opposition, with many of its leaders questioning the Centre’s move. Party leader and former Union minister, Kapil Sibal, has accused the Centre of trying to create a fake narrative and of using the delegations as a tool to promote its own agenda.
The opposition parties have also been critical of the Centre’s decision to send the delegations abroad without consulting them. Many have questioned the Centre’s authority to send them abroad on behalf of the government and have demanded that they be given a chance to participate in the decision-making process.
In contrast, the Centre has defended its move, saying that it is aimed at promoting international relations and promoting peace. The government has also claimed that the delegations will brief the opposition parties on the details of Operation Sindoor and that the exercise is aimed at strengthening ties between the two countries.
However, the opposition parties remain skeptical and have demanded that the Centre provide more information about the exercise. They have also questioned the Centre’s claims about the ceasefire agreement and have demanded that the government provide proof of the agreement.
The controversy has also sparked off a debate about the role of the opposition parties in the country. Many have questioned the opposition parties’ ability to hold the Centre accountable and have accused them of being ineffective in their role.
However, others have defended the opposition parties, saying that they are doing their job by questioning the Centre’s move and holding it accountable. They have also pointed out that the opposition parties are not being given a fair chance to participate in the decision-making process and are being marginalized by the Centre.
In conclusion, the Centre’s move to send delegations abroad on Operation Sindoor has sparked off a heated debate in the country. While the Centre claims that the exercise is aimed at promoting international relations and promoting peace, the opposition parties believe that it is a ploy to divert attention from real issues and that the Centre is trying to create a fake narrative. The controversy highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in governance and the importance of giving a fair chance to opposition parties to participate in the decision-making process.
Source:
