Brad will get 100x more than me as his films are in English: Vijay
The debate about the supremacy of English language in the entertainment industry has been ongoing for quite some time now. The latest addition to this conversation is Vijay Deverakonda, a popular Telugu actor, who has stirred up a controversy by stating that Brad Pitt gets paid 100 times more than him simply because his films are made in English. Deverakonda’s comment has sparked a heated debate about the importance of language in the film industry and the unfair advantages that English-speaking actors have.
In an interview, Deverakonda expressed his frustration about the disparity in pay between him and Brad Pitt. “Brad Pitt gets paid 100 times more than me. Which isn’t my fault but… fault of some guys who went and spread that language,” he said. “West came in hundreds of years ago and made sure all of us were speaking… in their language,” he added.
Deverakonda’s comment is not an isolated incident. There have been numerous instances where actors from non-English speaking countries have spoken about the unfair advantages that English-speaking actors have in the industry. For instance, Bollywood actor Randeep Hooda has often spoken about the lack of opportunities for Indian actors in Hollywood due to the language barrier.
The disparity in pay between Deverakonda and Pitt is not surprising. The global film market is dominated by English-speaking countries, and as a result, English-language films tend to attract a wider audience and generate more revenue. This means that actors who appear in English-language films tend to earn more than those who work in non-English speaking industries.
However, Deverakonda’s comment also highlights the issue of cultural imperialism. The spread of English language has had far-reaching consequences, not just for the film industry but also for the global economy and culture. English has become the dominant language of international communication, and it has been used to spread Western culture and values around the world.
Deverakonda’s comment also raises questions about the role of language in the film industry. Should actors who work in non-English speaking industries be penalized for not speaking English? Should they be forced to adapt to the English language in order to break into the global market? Or should the industry recognize the value of diverse languages and cultures and provide opportunities for actors from non-English speaking countries?
The issue of language in the film industry is complex and multifaceted. On one hand, the spread of English language has opened up new opportunities for actors from around the world to work in Hollywood and other English-speaking countries. On the other hand, it has also led to the marginalization of non-English speaking industries and the erasure of their cultures and languages.
In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards diversity and inclusion in the film industry. There are more opportunities for actors from diverse backgrounds to work in Hollywood and other English-speaking countries. However, there is still a long way to go in terms of recognizing the value of non-English speaking languages and cultures.
Deverakonda’s comment is a timely reminder of the importance of recognizing the value of diverse languages and cultures in the film industry. It is not just about the pay disparity between him and Pitt, but also about the cultural and economic implications of the spread of English language.
In conclusion, Deverakonda’s comment has sparked a necessary conversation about the role of language in the film industry. It is a reminder that the industry needs to recognize the value of diverse languages and cultures and provide opportunities for actors from non-English speaking countries. As the industry continues to evolve, it is essential that we prioritize diversity and inclusion and recognize the importance of non-English speaking languages and cultures.
