Madras HC sends Jana Nayagan-CBFC case back to single judge
The Madras High Court has made a significant decision in the ongoing case between the makers of Thalapathy Vijay’s upcoming film, Jana Nayagan, and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). In a recent order, the division bench of the court has set aside a single judge’s order directing the CBFC to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to the film. Instead, the matter has been sent back to the single judge for fresh consideration, allowing the makers to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order.
The case began when the CBFC refused to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to Jana Nayagan, citing certain objections to the film’s content. The makers of the film, who had been expecting a U/A 16+ certificate, were disappointed by the CBFC’s decision and decided to take the matter to court. They approached the Madras High Court, seeking a direction to the CBFC to grant the certificate.
The single judge who heard the case initially directed the CBFC to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to the film, which was a significant relief to the makers. However, the CBFC appealed against this order, arguing that the single judge had exceeded their jurisdiction in directing the grant of a certificate without considering the merits of the case.
The division bench of the Madras High Court, which heard the appeal, has now set aside the single judge’s order and sent the matter back for fresh consideration. The bench has directed the single judge to hear the case expeditiously and allow the makers to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order.
This decision is significant because it highlights the importance of following the proper procedure in cases involving the CBFC and film certification. The CBFC is a statutory body that is responsible for certifying films for public exhibition in India, and its decisions are subject to judicial review. However, the court has made it clear that the CBFC’s decisions cannot be overridden by a court without proper consideration of the merits of the case.
The decision is also a setback for the makers of Jana Nayagan, who had been hoping to release their film with a U/A 16+ certificate. The film, which stars Thalapathy Vijay in the lead role, has been generating a lot of buzz and excitement among fans. However, the delay in certification is likely to impact the film’s release schedule, and the makers will now have to wait for the single judge’s decision before they can proceed with the release.
The case highlights the complexities and challenges involved in film certification in India. The CBFC has been facing criticism in recent years for its conservative approach to film certification, and many filmmakers have complained about the board’s arbitrary decisions. The court’s decision in this case is likely to have implications for the film industry as a whole, and it will be interesting to see how the case unfolds in the coming days.
In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s decision to send the Jana Nayagan-CBFC case back to the single judge is a significant development that highlights the importance of following the proper procedure in cases involving film certification. The decision is a setback for the makers of the film, but it also underscores the need for the CBFC to follow a fair and transparent process in certifying films. As the case continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how the single judge decides the matter and what implications the decision will have for the film industry.
The Madras High Court’s decision is a reminder that the process of film certification in India is complex and often contentious. The CBFC’s decisions are subject to judicial review, and filmmakers have the right to challenge the board’s decisions in court. The case of Jana Nayagan is just one example of the many challenges involved in film certification, and it highlights the need for a fair, transparent, and efficient process that balances the need to protect public morals with the need to promote artistic freedom and creative expression.
As the film industry continues to evolve and grow, it is likely that we will see more cases like Jana Nayagan, where filmmakers challenge the CBFC’s decisions in court. The Madras High Court’s decision in this case is an important milestone in the ongoing debate about film certification in India, and it will be interesting to see how the case unfolds in the coming days.
About the Author
