Madras HC sends Jana Nayagan-CBFC case back to single judge
The Madras High Court has recently made a significant decision regarding the certification of Thalapathy Vijay’s upcoming film, Jana Nayagan. In a surprise turn of events, the court has set aside a single judge’s order that had directed the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to the film. Instead, the division bench of the court has sent the matter back to the single judge for fresh consideration, allowing the makers to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order.
The case has been making headlines in recent weeks, with the film’s makers and the CBFC locked in a dispute over the certification of the film. The CBFC had earlier refused to grant the film a U/A 16+ certificate, citing certain objections to the film’s content. The film’s makers had then approached the Madras High Court, seeking relief and challenging the CBFC’s decision.
The single judge’s order, which was passed earlier, had directed the CBFC to grant the film a U/A 16+ certificate, despite the board’s objections. However, the CBFC had appealed against this order, seeking a stay on the certification of the film. The division bench of the court, which heard the appeal, has now set aside the single judge’s order and sent the matter back for fresh consideration.
The court’s decision is significant, as it allows the film’s makers to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order. The court has also directed the single judge to hear the case expeditiously, ensuring that the matter is resolved as quickly as possible. This is a welcome move, as it will help to bring clarity and transparency to the certification process, and will also provide a fair opportunity to the film’s makers to present their case.
The certification of Jana Nayagan has been a contentious issue, with the CBFC and the film’s makers locked in a dispute over the film’s content. The CBFC had earlier objected to certain scenes and dialogues in the film, citing concerns over their potential impact on children and young audiences. The film’s makers, on the other hand, had argued that the film’s content was suitable for all ages, and that the CBFC’s objections were unfounded.
The Madras High Court’s decision to send the matter back to the single judge for fresh consideration is a significant development in the case. It provides a fresh opportunity for the film’s makers to present their case and challenge the CBFC’s decision. The court’s directive to the single judge to hear the case expeditiously is also a welcome move, as it will help to ensure that the matter is resolved quickly and efficiently.
The certification of films is an important issue, as it has a significant impact on the film industry and on audiences. The CBFC plays a crucial role in ensuring that films are suitable for all ages, and that they do not contain content that is objectionable or harmful. However, the certification process can also be contentious, with film makers and the CBFC often disagreeing over the suitability of certain content.
In recent years, there have been several instances of films being delayed or refused certification due to disputes over their content. The certification of films like Udta Punjab and Lipstick Under My Burkha had been delayed due to objections from the CBFC, sparking a controversy over the board’s role in regulating film content. The certification of Jana Nayagan has also been a contentious issue, with the film’s makers and the CBFC locked in a dispute over the film’s content.
The Madras High Court’s decision to send the matter back to the single judge for fresh consideration is a significant development in the case. It provides a fresh opportunity for the film’s makers to present their case and challenge the CBFC’s decision. The court’s directive to the single judge to hear the case expeditiously is also a welcome move, as it will help to ensure that the matter is resolved quickly and efficiently.
In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s decision to send the Jana Nayagan-CBFC case back to the single judge is a significant development in the case. It provides a fresh opportunity for the film’s makers to present their case and challenge the CBFC’s decision. The court’s directive to the single judge to hear the case expeditiously is also a welcome move, as it will help to ensure that the matter is resolved quickly and efficiently. The certification of films is an important issue, and the court’s decision will have a significant impact on the film industry and on audiences.
About the Author
