Madras HC sends Jana Nayagan-CBFC case back to single judge
The Madras High Court has made a significant decision in the ongoing case between the makers of Thalapathy Vijay’s upcoming film, Jana Nayagan, and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). In a recent order, the division bench of the court has set aside a single judge’s order directing the CBFC to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to the film. Instead, the matter has been sent back to the single judge for fresh consideration, allowing the makers to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order.
For those who may be unaware, the CBFC had earlier refused to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to Jana Nayagan, citing certain objections. The film’s makers had then approached the Madras High Court, seeking a direction to the CBFC to grant the desired certificate. In response, the single judge had ordered the CBFC to grant the U/A 16+ certificate, which was then challenged by the CBFC in the division bench.
The division bench’s decision to send the matter back to the single judge is a significant development in the case. By doing so, the court has ensured that the case is heard expeditiously and that the makers of the film have an opportunity to amend their plea and challenge the CBFC chairperson’s order. This decision also highlights the importance of following the proper procedure in such cases, where the CBFC’s decisions can have a significant impact on the film’s release and box office performance.
The case has been widely followed in the Indian film industry, with many stakeholders keenly watching the developments. The decision of the Madras High Court is likely to have implications for other films that may be facing similar issues with the CBFC. The CBFC’s role in certifying films is crucial, as it ensures that the content of the film is suitable for the audience. However, the board’s decisions can sometimes be subjective, leading to disputes and court cases.
In recent years, there have been several instances where film makers have approached the courts, challenging the CBFC’s decisions. These cases have often highlighted the need for a more transparent and consistent approach by the CBFC in certifying films. The Madras High Court’s decision in the Jana Nayagan case is a step in this direction, as it emphasizes the importance of following the proper procedure and ensuring that the film makers have an opportunity to present their case.
The film, Jana Nayagan, is one of the most highly anticipated releases of the year, with Thalapathy Vijay playing the lead role. The film’s makers have been keen to release the film with a U/A 16+ certificate, which would allow them to reach a wider audience. However, the CBFC’s objections have created a hurdle, which the film makers are now trying to overcome through the courts.
The Madras High Court’s decision to send the matter back to the single judge is a positive development for the film makers, as it gives them an opportunity to present their case and challenge the CBFC’s decision. The court’s emphasis on expeditious hearing and allowing the makers to amend their plea is also a significant aspect of the order. This approach will ensure that the case is heard quickly and that the film makers have an opportunity to present their case in a thorough and effective manner.
In conclusion, the Madras High Court’s decision in the Jana Nayagan case is a significant development in the ongoing dispute between the film makers and the CBFC. The decision to send the matter back to the single judge for fresh consideration is a positive step, as it allows the film makers to present their case and challenge the CBFC’s decision. The case highlights the importance of following the proper procedure in such cases and the need for a more transparent and consistent approach by the CBFC in certifying films. As the case progresses, it will be interesting to see how the single judge hears the matter and what decision is ultimately made.
About the Author
