Govt did exactly what I recommended: Shashi Tharoor on Op Sindoor
In a recent statement, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor sparked a wave of discussion when he expressed his disagreement with his party’s stance on Operation Sindoor. Tharoor’s comments came as a surprise to many, given the party’s strong opposition to the government’s actions. However, the MP clarified that his stance was not a result of any internal conflict, but rather a matter of principle. According to Tharoor, the government’s actions during Operation Sindoor were in line with his own recommendations, which he had outlined in a column following the Pahalgam attack.
Tharoor’s column, written in response to the Pahalgam attack, had outlined a clear plan of action for the Indian government to take in response to such incidents. The MP had argued that a strong and decisive response was necessary to deter future attacks and to demonstrate India’s commitment to protecting its citizens. When asked about his party’s opposition to Operation Sindoor, Tharoor stated, “How do you expect me to criticise what I myself recommended? I supported it fully.” This statement reflects Tharoor’s unapologetic stance on the issue, and his commitment to standing by his principles, even if they diverge from his party’s official position.
Tharoor’s recommendation had been based on a careful analysis of the situation and a consideration of the various options available to the government. He had argued that a measured response, which balanced the need for decisive action with the need to avoid escalation, was the most effective way to address the situation. The government’s actions during Operation Sindoor, according to Tharoor, were in line with this approach, and therefore, he saw no reason to criticise them.
The Congress party’s opposition to Operation Sindoor, on the other hand, has been based on concerns about the potential consequences of such actions. Some party leaders have argued that the government’s response was disproportionate and could lead to further escalation. However, Tharoor’s stance suggests that he does not share these concerns, and believes that the government’s actions were necessary and justified.
Tharoor’s comments have sparked a lively debate within the Congress party, with some leaders expressing disagreement with his stance. However, the MP remains unapologetic, and has stated that he will continue to speak his mind on issues of national importance. This willingness to take a stand, even if it means going against his party’s official position, is reflective of Tharoor’s commitment to his principles and his constituents.
The Pahalgam attack, which prompted Tharoor’s column and the government’s response, was a tragic reminder of the ongoing security challenges faced by India. The attack, which resulted in the loss of innocent lives, was widely condemned by leaders across the political spectrum. In the aftermath of the attack, there were calls for a strong response from the government, with many arguing that decisive action was necessary to prevent such incidents in the future.
Tharoor’s column, and the government’s subsequent response, were both attempts to address this challenge. While the Congress party’s opposition to Operation Sindoor reflects a divergence of opinion on the best way to address this challenge, Tharoor’s stance reflects his commitment to finding a solution that balances the need for security with the need to avoid escalation.
In conclusion, Shashi Tharoor’s comments on Operation Sindoor reflect his commitment to principle and his willingness to take a stand, even if it means going against his party’s official position. The MP’s recommendation, outlined in his column following the Pahalgam attack, had called for a strong and decisive response from the government. The government’s actions during Operation Sindoor, according to Tharoor, were in line with this approach, and therefore, he sees no reason to criticise them. As the debate over Operation Sindoor continues, Tharoor’s stance serves as a reminder of the importance of principle and the need for leaders to take a stand on issues of national importance.
News Source: https://x.com/pradip103/status/2015265846512488667