RGV backtracks after claiming AR Rahman didn’t compose ‘Jai Ho’
The Indian film industry is no stranger to controversy, and the latest storm has been stirred by none other than filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma. In an old clip that recently resurfaced, Varma can be seen claiming that the Oscar-winning song ‘Jai Ho’ from the movie Slumdog Millionaire was not composed by the legendary AR Rahman, but rather by singer Sukhwinder Singh. This statement sent shockwaves through the music and film fraternity, with many coming out to defend Rahman’s credentials as the composer of the iconic song.
For those who may be unaware, ‘Jai Ho’ is a song from the 2008 movie Slumdog Millionaire, which was directed by Danny Boyle. The song was composed by AR Rahman, with lyrics by Gulzar and Sukhwinder Singh being one of the singers. The song won several awards, including the Academy Award for Best Original Song, making AR Rahman the first Indian to win an Oscar.
The clip of Ram Gopal Varma’s statement sparked a heated debate on social media, with many calling out the filmmaker for his claims. However, soon after the clip resurfaced, Varma took to social media to clarify his statement, claiming that he was being misquoted and misread out of context. In a series of tweets, Varma expressed his admiration for AR Rahman, calling him the “greatest composer and nicest person” he had ever met. Varma also stated that Rahman was the last person he would want to take away credit from, implying that his earlier statement was not meant to belittle the composer’s achievements.
It’s worth noting that this is not the first time Ram Gopal Varma has been at the center of a controversy. The filmmaker has been known for his outspoken views and has often found himself at odds with other members of the film industry. While Varma’s clarification may have helped to diffuse the situation to some extent, it’s clear that his initial statement has caused a significant amount of damage to his reputation.
The question on everyone’s mind is – what prompted Ram Gopal Varma to make such a statement in the first place? Was it a genuine mistake, or was there an ulterior motive at play? While we may never know the answer to this question, it’s clear that Varma’s statement has sparked a necessary conversation about the importance of giving credit where credit is due.
In the Indian film industry, it’s not uncommon for composers, singers, and lyricists to be overlooked or underappreciated. The success of a movie is often attributed to the actors, directors, and producers, while the people behind the music are often relegated to the background. This is a phenomenon that is not unique to India, but it’s particularly pronounced in the Bollywood industry, where the focus is often on the stars and the spectacle rather than the people who work behind the scenes.
The controversy surrounding Ram Gopal Varma’s statement has highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the film industry. It’s essential for filmmakers, composers, and singers to be honest and transparent about their creative processes and to give credit where credit is due. This not only helps to promote a culture of fairness and respect but also ensures that the people who work behind the scenes are recognized and rewarded for their contributions.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Ram Gopal Varma’s statement about AR Rahman and the song ‘Jai Ho’ has sparked a necessary conversation about the importance of giving credit where credit is due. While Varma’s clarification may have helped to diffuse the situation, it’s clear that his initial statement has caused a significant amount of damage to his reputation. As the Indian film industry continues to evolve and grow, it’s essential for filmmakers, composers, and singers to be honest and transparent about their creative processes and to recognize and reward the people who work behind the scenes.
Read more about this story at https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/ram-gopal-varma-claims-ar-rahman-didnt-compose-oscar-winning-jai-ho-director-claims-misquote-101768984847233-amp.html