Judge who ordered FIR on ASP Anuj Chaudhary in Sambhal violence case transferred
In a significant development, Sambhal Chief Judicial Magistrate Vibhanshu Sudheer, who had ordered the registration of an FIR against ASP Anuj Chaudhary, inspector Anuj Tomar, and 20 unidentified police officials for their alleged role in shooting at a youth during the 2024 Sambhal violence, has been transferred. The transfer order, which was issued on Tuesday, has appointed Sudheer as the new Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sultanpur.
The Sambhal violence case has been a highly controversial and sensitive issue, with many questions being raised about the role of the police and the administration in handling the situation. The incident had sparked widespread outrage and protests, with many demanding justice for the victims and accountability from the authorities.
The FIR, which was ordered by Sudheer, had named ASP Anuj Chaudhary, inspector Anuj Tomar, and 20 unidentified police officials for their alleged role in the shooting incident. The FIR was registered under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including attempt to murder and rioting.
Sudheer’s transfer has raised many eyebrows, with some questioning the timing and motives behind the move. While the authorities have maintained that the transfer is a routine administrative decision, many believe that it is an attempt to influence the outcome of the case.
The Sambhal violence case has been a major embarrassment for the state government, with many opposition parties and human rights groups criticizing the administration for its handling of the situation. The case has also sparked a heated debate about the role of the police and the need for greater accountability and transparency in their actions.
In a related development, Aditya Singh, who had ordered the survey of the Shahi Jama Masjid, will be taking over as the new Chief Judicial Magistrate of Sambhal. Singh’s appointment has been seen as a significant move, given his previous experience and expertise in handling sensitive cases.
The transfer of Sudheer and the appointment of Singh as the new CJM are likely to have significant implications for the Sambhal violence case. While the authorities have maintained that the transfer is a routine decision, many believe that it will have a major impact on the outcome of the case.
The Sambhal violence case has highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the actions of the police and the administration. The case has also sparked a heated debate about the role of the judiciary in ensuring justice and upholding the rule of law.
In recent years, there have been many instances of judges being transferred or removed from sensitive cases, raising concerns about the independence of the judiciary. The transfer of Sudheer has once again raised questions about the independence of the judiciary and the ability of judges to take decisions without fear or favor.
The Sambhal violence case is a complex and sensitive issue, with many different parties and interests involved. The case has sparked widespread outrage and protests, with many demanding justice for the victims and accountability from the authorities.
As the case continues to unfold, it is likely to have significant implications for the state government and the police administration. The case has already sparked a heated debate about the role of the police and the need for greater accountability and transparency in their actions.
The transfer of Sudheer and the appointment of Singh as the new CJM are likely to be closely watched, with many expecting significant developments in the case in the coming days. The case has highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the actions of the police and the administration, and it remains to be seen how the new CJM will handle the case.
In conclusion, the transfer of Sambhal Chief Judicial Magistrate Vibhanshu Sudheer, who had ordered the registration of an FIR against ASP Anuj Chaudhary and other police officials for their alleged role in the Sambhal violence case, has raised many questions about the independence of the judiciary and the ability of judges to take decisions without fear or favor. The case has highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the actions of the police and the administration, and it remains to be seen how the new CJM will handle the case.
About the Author
