Startup founder says BBMP sought bribe for water connection, gave official & unofficial options
As a startup founder, Ravichandra Reddy thought he had overcome the initial hurdles of setting up his business in Bengaluru. However, his latest ordeal with the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) has left him frustrated and disillusioned with the system. Reddy recently took to social media to allege that BBMP officials demanded bribes from him for road-cutting work related to getting a water connection for his startup.
According to Reddy, the water pipeline was located on the opposite side of the road from his startup’s premises, making it necessary to cut the road to lay the pipeline. This is a common requirement for many businesses and residents in Bengaluru, where the water supply infrastructure is often inadequate. However, what Reddy experienced was far from a smooth and transparent process.
Reddy claimed that the BBMP officials he dealt with demanded ₹80,000 as the official payment for the road-cutting work, along with an additional ₹20,000 as a bribe. This was presented to him as the “official” option. Alternatively, the officials offered him an “unofficial” option, where he could pay ₹40,000, but would have to restore the road himself after the pipeline work was completed. This unofficial option essentially meant that Reddy would have to bear the cost of restoring the road, which is typically the responsibility of the BBMP.
Reddy’s allegations highlight the pervasive corruption and lack of transparency in the BBMP’s dealings with citizens and businesses. The fact that officials are openly demanding bribes and offering unofficial options to citizens is a clear indication of the deep-seated corruption in the system. It also raises questions about the accountability and oversight mechanisms within the BBMP, which seem to be lacking in this case.
The demand for bribes by BBMP officials is not an isolated incident. Many citizens and businesses in Bengaluru have reported similar experiences, where they have been forced to pay bribes to get basic services such as water connections, trade licenses, and building permits. This culture of corruption not only undermines the trust of citizens in the government but also creates an uneven playing field for businesses, where those who are willing to pay bribes are able to get ahead, while others are left behind.
Reddy’s case also highlights the difficulties faced by startups and small businesses in Bengaluru, which often struggle to navigate the complex and bureaucratic regulatory environment. The city’s reputation as a hub for startups and innovation is built on the idea of ease of doing business and a supportive ecosystem. However, cases like Reddy’s suggest that the reality on the ground is far from this ideal.
The BBMP’s response to Reddy’s allegations has been muted so far, with no official statement or action taken against the officials involved. This lack of response only serves to reinforce the perception that corruption is tolerated and even encouraged within the BBMP.
In conclusion, the allegations made by Ravichandra Reddy against the BBMP officials are a stark reminder of the corruption and lack of transparency that plagues the system. The fact that officials are openly demanding bribes and offering unofficial options to citizens is a clear indication of the deep-seated corruption in the system. It is essential that the BBMP takes immediate action to investigate these allegations and takes steps to prevent such incidents in the future. The city’s reputation as a hub for startups and innovation depends on it.
As Reddy’s case highlights, the fight against corruption requires a sustained effort from citizens, businesses, and the government. It is only by working together that we can create a transparent and accountable system that supports the growth and development of our city.
About the Author
