95% of AI pilots fail to deliver meaningful efficiency: TCS CEO
The world of artificial intelligence (AI) has been abuzz with excitement and promise, with many organizations investing heavily in AI pilots to drive efficiency and innovation. However, according to K Krithivasan, CEO of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), a staggering 95% of these AI pilots have failed to deliver measurable value. This startling revelation has significant implications for businesses and organizations seeking to harness the power of AI to drive growth and competitiveness.
Krithivasan’s comments, citing research, suggest that the vast majority of AI pilots have not been able to translate into meaningful efficiency gains. This is a sobering reminder that the implementation of AI is not a guarantee of success, and that careful planning, execution, and measurement are essential to achieving tangible benefits. As Krithivasan noted, “As we look ahead to 2026, a clearer picture of AI’s impact is emerging.” This statement underscores the importance of taking a nuanced and informed approach to AI adoption, rather than simply jumping on the bandwagon.
Krithivasan’s remarks also highlighted the evolving nature of organizational intelligence, where humans and machines collaborate to drive decision-making. He observed, “We are witnessing…a new form of organisational intelligence, where combinations of humans and machines shape how choices are developed, presented and discussed.” This perspective emphasizes the need for a hybrid approach, where AI is used to augment human capabilities, rather than replace them. By leveraging the strengths of both humans and machines, organizations can unlock new levels of efficiency, innovation, and competitiveness.
So, what are the key factors that contribute to the failure of AI pilots to deliver meaningful efficiency? According to Krithivasan, there are several core principles that organizations must adhere to in order to ensure the successful implementation of AI. These principles include:
- Clear goals and objectives: Organizations must have a clear understanding of what they want to achieve through AI, and must define specific, measurable goals and objectives.
- Data quality and availability: AI requires high-quality, relevant data to function effectively. Organizations must ensure that they have access to the right data, and that it is properly curated and managed.
- Human-machine collaboration: AI is most effective when used in conjunction with human capabilities. Organizations must design systems that facilitate collaboration between humans and machines, and that leverage the strengths of both.
- Continuous monitoring and evaluation: AI pilots must be continuously monitored and evaluated to ensure that they are delivering the desired outcomes. This requires a culture of experimentation, learning, and adaptation.
- Organizational readiness: Organizations must be prepared to adapt their processes, culture, and skills to accommodate AI. This requires a significant investment in change management, training, and upskilling.
By following these core principles, organizations can increase their chances of success with AI, and avoid the pitfalls that have led to the failure of so many AI pilots. As Krithivasan noted, the key to successful AI adoption is to take a thoughtful, informed, and nuanced approach, and to be willing to learn and adapt along the way.
In conclusion, the failure of 95% of AI pilots to deliver meaningful efficiency is a wake-up call for organizations to reassess their approach to AI adoption. By following the core principles outlined by Krithivasan, and by taking a hybrid approach that leverages the strengths of both humans and machines, organizations can unlock the full potential of AI and drive meaningful efficiency gains. As we look ahead to 2026, it is clear that AI will continue to play a major role in shaping the future of business and society. The question is, will your organization be among the 5% that succeed in harnessing the power of AI, or will you be left behind?
About the Author
