Why will BMC not declare winners in 3 Mumbai wards?
The recently concluded Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) polls have been marred by controversy, with the counting of votes being halted in three Mumbai wards. As a result, the winners in these wards will not be declared, leaving the fate of the candidates and their supporters in limbo. In this blog post, we will delve into the reasons behind this unexpected turn of events and explore the implications of this decision.
The BMC polls, which were held to elect representatives to the municipal corporation, were largely seen as a crucial test of strength for the various political parties in the state. The polls were marked by a high voter turnout, with citizens from all walks of life exercising their franchise to choose their representatives. However, the counting of votes in three wards – 72, 189, and 190 – was halted due to various reasons, leading to a delay in the declaration of results.
In Ward no 72, the result was put on hold due to alleged irregularities in the counting of votes. The returning officer, responsible for overseeing the counting process, reportedly detected discrepancies in the counting of votes, which led to a halt in the counting process. The irregularities, which have not been specified, have raised questions about the integrity of the electoral process and the possibility of tampering with the votes. The authorities have launched an investigation into the matter, and the results will be declared only after the discrepancies have been resolved.
In Ward number 189, the result was reserved after the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) reportedly failed to display data. The EVM, which is used to record votes, is a critical component of the electoral process, and any malfunction can have serious consequences. In this case, the EVM’s failure to display data has raised concerns about the reliability of the machine and the possibility of technical glitches. The authorities have taken the EVM into custody and are investigating the cause of the malfunction. The results will be declared only after the issue has been resolved and the votes have been counted manually.
The counting of votes was also stopped in ward number 190, although the reasons for this are not entirely clear. The authorities have not specified the reasons for the halt, leading to speculation and rumors among the candidates and their supporters. The delay in declaring the results has created uncertainty and tension, with the candidates and their supporters eagerly awaiting the outcome.
The decision not to declare winners in these three wards has significant implications for the candidates and their parties. The delay in declaring the results can affect the overall outcome of the polls, as the winners in these wards may hold the key to the formation of the municipal corporation. The parties may have to wait for an extended period to know the fate of their candidates, which can impact their strategy and planning for the future.
The controversy surrounding the BMC polls has also raised questions about the efficacy of the electoral process. The alleged irregularities and technical glitches have highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the electoral process. The authorities must take steps to address these concerns and ensure that the electoral process is fair, free, and transparent.
In conclusion, the BMC’s decision not to declare winners in three Mumbai wards has created uncertainty and tension among the candidates and their supporters. The alleged irregularities and technical glitches have raised questions about the integrity of the electoral process and the reliability of the EVMs. The authorities must take steps to address these concerns and ensure that the electoral process is fair, free, and transparent. The delay in declaring the results may have significant implications for the candidates and their parties, and it is essential that the authorities resolve the issues at the earliest to ensure the smooth functioning of the municipal corporation.
About the Author
