TDP in Andhra Pradesh approves allotment of 466 acres to SSEL
In a move that has raised eyebrows across the state, the Telugu Desam Party (TDP)-led government in Andhra Pradesh has approved the allotment of 466 acres in the Kadapa district to Shirdi Sai Electricals Limited (SSEL) for setting up a ₹4,914 crore greenfield manufacturing facility. This decision has been met with surprise and criticism, as the TDP, while in opposition, had labelled SSEL as a “benami” (front) company for the then-Chief Minister, Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, who is now the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh from the YSR Congress Party (YSRCP).
The TDP’s U-turn on SSEL has sparked a heated debate, with many questioning the party’s motives and the rationale behind the allotment of such a large tract of land to a single company. The decision is seen as a reversal of the TDP’s stance on SSEL, which it had earlier accused of being a front company for Jagan Mohan Reddy. The TDP had, in fact, moved a resolution in the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly in 2012, demanding a probe into the allegations of benami transactions involving SSEL.
The allotment of 466 acres to SSEL is expected to facilitate the setting up of a greenfield manufacturing facility, which will produce electrical equipment, including transformers, switchgear, and other related products. The project is estimated to generate employment opportunities for over 10,000 people and is expected to contribute significantly to the state’s economy. However, the decision to grant the land to SSEL has raised concerns about the transparency and accountability of the TDP-led government.
The opposition parties, including the YSRCP, have been quick to criticize the TDP’s decision, calling it a “betrayal” of the people’s trust. They have accused the TDP of having a “hidden agenda” and of trying to “favor” SSEL, which they claim is still a benami company. The YSRCP has also demanded that the government come clean on the details of the allotment, including the terms and conditions of the agreement and the benefits that will accrue to the state.
The TDP, on the other hand, has defended its decision, stating that the allotment of land to SSEL is in line with the government’s policy of promoting industrial growth and development in the state. The party has claimed that the project will bring in significant investments and create jobs, which will benefit the people of Andhra Pradesh. The TDP has also denied any wrongdoing, stating that the allotment of land to SSEL has been made in a transparent and fair manner, following all the necessary procedures and guidelines.
The controversy surrounding the allotment of land to SSEL has once again brought to the forefront the issue of benami transactions and the need for greater transparency and accountability in the allocation of government land. The opposition parties have been demanding that the government take steps to prevent benami transactions and ensure that government land is allocated in a fair and transparent manner.
The decision to allot 466 acres to SSEL has also raised concerns about the impact on the environment and the local community. The project is expected to generate significant pollution, including air and water pollution, which could have adverse effects on the health and well-being of the local population. The government has assured that all necessary measures will be taken to mitigate the environmental impact of the project, but the opposition parties have expressed skepticism, stating that the government has a poor track record on environmental protection.
In conclusion, the TDP-led government’s decision to allot 466 acres to SSEL has sparked a heated debate, with many questioning the party’s motives and the rationale behind the allotment of such a large tract of land to a single company. While the project is expected to generate significant investments and create jobs, the controversy surrounding the allotment of land to SSEL has once again brought to the forefront the issue of benami transactions and the need for greater transparency and accountability in the allocation of government land. The government must ensure that the project is implemented in a transparent and fair manner, with all necessary measures taken to mitigate the environmental impact and protect the interests of the local community.
About the Author
