Litigants to now get court fee back even in private deals in Delhi
In a significant move, the Delhi Assembly has passed an amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, which is set to bring relief to litigants in the city. As per the new amendment, a petitioner will now be eligible to receive a full refund of court fees even if disputes are settled outside the court through private deals. This move is expected to benefit a large number of litigants who often have to bear the burden of court fees, even when they are able to resolve their disputes amicably.
Currently, the rules regarding court fee refunds are quite stringent. Petitioners are entitled to a 100% refund of court fees only when disputes are resolved through court-referred alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms, such as mediation or arbitration. However, in cases where disputes are settled through private agreements or out-of-court settlements, petitioners are only eligible for a 50% refund of the court fees paid. This has often been seen as a deterrent to litigants who may be willing to settle their disputes amicably, but are discouraged by the prospect of losing a significant portion of their court fees.
The new amendment aims to change this scenario by allowing litigants to claim a full refund of court fees, regardless of whether the dispute is resolved through a court-referred ADR mechanism or a private settlement. This move is expected to encourage more litigants to explore out-of-court settlements, which can be a more efficient and cost-effective way of resolving disputes.
The benefits of this amendment are multifaceted. For one, it will help reduce the financial burden on litigants, who often have to pay hefty court fees in order to initiate legal proceedings. By allowing for a full refund of court fees, the amendment will help litigants recover a significant portion of their costs, even if they are able to resolve their disputes without going to trial.
Another significant benefit of this amendment is that it will help reduce the backlog of cases in Delhi’s courts. By encouraging litigants to explore out-of-court settlements, the amendment will help reduce the number of cases that actually go to trial, thereby easing the burden on the courts. This, in turn, will help speed up the judicial process and ensure that justice is delivered more efficiently.
Furthermore, the amendment will also help promote a culture of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Delhi. By making it more financially viable for litigants to explore out-of-court settlements, the amendment will encourage more people to use ADR mechanisms, such as mediation and arbitration, to resolve their disputes. This will not only help reduce the burden on the courts but also promote a more conciliatory approach to dispute resolution.
It is worth noting that the amendment will apply to all types of cases, including civil and commercial disputes. This means that litigants who are involved in disputes related to property, contracts, or other commercial matters will also be eligible for a full refund of court fees, provided they are able to resolve their disputes through private settlements.
In conclusion, the amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, is a welcome move that is expected to benefit a large number of litigants in Delhi. By allowing for a full refund of court fees, even in cases of private settlements, the amendment will help reduce the financial burden on litigants and promote a culture of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the city. It will also help reduce the backlog of cases in Delhi’s courts and ensure that justice is delivered more efficiently.
The move is a significant step forward in making the judicial process more efficient and cost-effective. It is hoped that other states will follow Delhi’s lead and introduce similar amendments to their court fee rules, in order to benefit litigants across the country.
About the Author
