Chance of influencing witnesses after bail in POCSO cases real: SC
The Supreme Court of India has made a significant statement regarding the granting of bail in cases involving the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The court has stated that the likelihood of evidence tampering or influencing witnesses after the grant of bail in such cases is a legitimate and grave concern. This statement was made as the court cancelled the bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to a youth from Shamli in Uttar Pradesh, accused of repeated penetrative sexual assault under armed intimidation of a minor.
The POCSO Act was enacted in 2012 to provide a robust legal framework for the protection of children from sexual abuse, sexual exploitation, and pornography. The Act defines various types of sexual offences against children, including penetrative sexual assault, non-penetrative sexual assault, sexual harassment, and pornography. The Act also provides for the establishment of Special Courts to try offences under the Act and for the appointment of Special Public Prosecutors to prosecute such cases.
In the present case, the accused had been granted bail by the Allahabad High Court, despite the serious nature of the allegations against him. The Supreme Court, however, took a dim view of the High Court’s decision and cancelled the bail. The court observed that the likelihood of evidence tampering or influencing witnesses after the grant of bail in POCSO cases is a real and legitimate concern. The court noted that such cases often involve vulnerable victims, including children, who may be easily intimidated or influenced by the accused.
The Supreme Court’s decision highlights the need for a cautious approach when it comes to granting bail in POCSO cases. The court’s concern is not unfounded, as there have been instances where accused persons have attempted to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence after being granted bail. Such attempts can have serious consequences, including the collapse of the prosecution’s case and the acquittal of the accused.
The Supreme Court’s decision is also significant because it recognizes the vulnerability of child victims in POCSO cases. Children who have been subjected to sexual abuse or exploitation are often traumatized and may require special care and protection. The court’s decision acknowledges the need to protect such children from further harm or exploitation, including the risk of being influenced or intimidated by the accused.
The cancellation of bail in this case also underscores the importance of ensuring that the investigation and prosecution of POCSO cases are carried out in a fair and impartial manner. The Supreme Court’s decision sends a strong message that the granting of bail in such cases will be scrutinized closely, and that the courts will not hesitate to cancel bail if there is a risk of evidence tampering or witness intimidation.
In recent years, there have been several instances where the Supreme Court has emphasized the need for a strict approach when it comes to dealing with cases involving sexual offences against children. The court has consistently held that such cases require a sensitive and nuanced approach, taking into account the vulnerability of the victims and the need to protect them from further harm or exploitation.
The Supreme Court’s decision in this case is a welcome step in the right direction. It recognizes the gravity of POCSO cases and the need for a cautious approach when it comes to granting bail. The decision also highlights the importance of protecting child victims from further harm or exploitation and ensuring that the investigation and prosecution of such cases are carried out in a fair and impartial manner.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision in this case is a significant statement on the need for a cautious approach when it comes to granting bail in POCSO cases. The court’s concern about the likelihood of evidence tampering or influencing witnesses after the grant of bail is a legitimate and grave one. The decision underscores the importance of protecting child victims from further harm or exploitation and ensuring that the investigation and prosecution of POCSO cases are carried out in a fair and impartial manner.
About the Author
