Foolish to think censor board is still relevant: RGV on Jana Nayagan row
The controversy surrounding Vijay’s latest film, ‘Jana Nayagan’, has sparked a heated debate in the Indian film industry. The film, which has been denied a censor certificate by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), has led to a row between the film’s producers and the censor board. Amidst this controversy, renowned filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma has come out strongly against the censor board, stating that it is “foolish to think that the censor board is still relevant today”.
Varma’s comments have sparked a fresh debate on the relevance of the censor board in today’s digital age. According to him, the censor board was born in an era when the state controlled the media, and it was necessary to regulate the content that was being fed to the public. However, with the advent of the internet and social media, any form of control is impossible. “Censor board was born in an era when the state controlled the media, but today, any form of control is impossible,” he said.
Varma blamed the film industry for allowing the CBFC to exist for so long. He argued that the industry has been complicit in the censor board’s actions, and it is high time that the industry takes a stand against the board’s outdated rules and regulations. “It’s foolish to think that the censor board is still relevant today. The film industry has allowed the CBFC to exist for so long, and it’s time that we take a stand against it,” he said.
The controversy surrounding ‘Jana Nayagan’ is not an isolated incident. The CBFC has been in the news several times in the past for its stringent rules and regulations. The board has been accused of being overly conservative and out of touch with the changing times. Many filmmakers have complained about the board’s arbitrary decisions, which often lead to delays and losses for the producers.
The censor board’s actions have also been criticized for being insulting to the viewers. By dictating what can and cannot be shown on screen, the board is essentially treating the audience like children who cannot make their own decisions. Varma argued that the censor board’s actions are an insult to the intelligence of the viewers. “The censor board insults the viewers by treating them like children who cannot make their own decisions. It’s time that we trust the audience to make their own choices,” he said.
The issue of censorship is not limited to the film industry. It is a broader issue that affects the entire society. In today’s digital age, information is freely available, and people have access to a wide range of content from all over the world. The idea of censorship is becoming increasingly outdated, and it is time that we rethink our approach to regulation.
Varma’s comments have sparked a much-needed debate on the relevance of the censor board. While some have argued that the board is still necessary to regulate the content that is being fed to the public, others have argued that it is time to abolish the board altogether. The fact remains that the censor board is no longer effective in today’s digital age, and it is time that we find new ways to regulate the content that is being produced.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding ‘Jana Nayagan’ has highlighted the need for a rethink on the role of the censor board in the film industry. Ram Gopal Varma’s comments have sparked a fresh debate on the relevance of the board, and it is time that we take a closer look at the board’s rules and regulations. The film industry has a responsibility to produce content that is responsible and sensitive, but it is also important to trust the audience to make their own decisions. As Varma said, “It’s foolish to think that the censor board is still relevant today.” It is time that we move on from the outdated rules and regulations of the censor board and find new ways to regulate the content that is being produced.
About the Author
