Foolish to think censor board is still relevant: RGV on Jana Nayagan row
The recent controversy surrounding Vijay’s film “Jana Nayagan” not getting a censor certificate from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has sparked a heated debate in the film industry. The film, which is a Tamil-language political thriller, has been at the center of attention due to its alleged anti-government content. Amidst this row, renowned filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma has come out and expressed his opinion on the matter, stating that it’s “foolish to think that the censor board is still relevant today.”
Varma’s statement has ignited a fresh wave of discussion on the relevance and effectiveness of the censor board in today’s digital age. According to him, the censor board was born in an era when the state controlled the media, and it was necessary to regulate the content that was being consumed by the masses. However, with the advent of technology and the internet, the dynamics of content consumption have changed drastically. “Censor board was born in an era when the state controlled the media, but today, any form of control is impossible,” Varma said.
Varma’s argument is that the censor board has become outdated and is no longer effective in regulating the content that is being consumed by the audience. With the rise of social media, online streaming platforms, and the internet, people have access to a vast array of content from all over the world. The traditional model of censorship, where a board of officials decides what is suitable for the masses, is no longer relevant. Varma believes that the film industry is to blame for allowing the censor board to exist for so long, despite its ineffectiveness.
The censor board’s role is to certify films based on their content, ensuring that they meet certain standards of decency and morality. However, the board’s decisions are often subjective and can be influenced by various factors, including political pressure and personal biases. This has led to many filmmakers and artists feeling stifled and restricted by the board’s guidelines. Varma’s statement highlights the need for a more modern and effective system of content regulation, one that takes into account the changing dynamics of the media landscape.
The controversy surrounding “Jana Nayagan” is a prime example of the censor board’s ineffectiveness. The film’s alleged anti-government content has sparked a heated debate, with some politicians and officials calling for the film to be banned. However, the film’s director and producers have argued that the film is a work of fiction and does not promote any anti-government ideology. The censor board’s decision to withhold the film’s certificate has been seen as a form of censorship, which has sparked outrage among many in the film industry.
Varma’s statement has been met with both support and criticism from various quarters. Some have argued that the censor board is still necessary to regulate the content that is being consumed by the masses, especially children and young adults. Others have argued that the board’s guidelines are too restrictive and stifle creativity and freedom of expression. The debate highlights the complexities of the issue and the need for a more nuanced and balanced approach to content regulation.
In conclusion, Ram Gopal Varma’s statement on the censor board’s relevance has sparked a much-needed debate on the effectiveness of the board in today’s digital age. The controversy surrounding “Jana Nayagan” is a prime example of the need for a more modern and effective system of content regulation. As Varma said, “It’s foolish to think that the censor board is still relevant today.” The film industry and the government need to come together to find a solution that balances the need for regulation with the need for freedom of expression and creativity.
The issue of censorship is complex and multifaceted, and there are no easy answers. However, one thing is clear: the traditional model of censorship is no longer effective, and a new approach is needed. The film industry and the government need to work together to find a solution that takes into account the changing dynamics of the media landscape. Until then, the debate will continue, and filmmakers like Ram Gopal Varma will continue to speak out against the censor board’s outdated and ineffective system.
About the Author
