Haryana Govt’s Act Helps Rape Convict Ram Rahim Get Repeated Parole
The Haryana government’s recent legislation, the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, has been making headlines for its controversial provisions. One of the most notable aspects of this law is its allowance for convicted prisoners to be released on parole for a significant period. The Act permits prisoners to be released for 10 weeks each year, which has raised concerns among many. Furthermore, the law also provides a provision for ‘hardcore convicted prisoners’ who have served at least five years of their sentence, including two years under trial, to receive regular parole. This provision has come under scrutiny, particularly in the case of rape convict Ram Rahim, who has been in jail since 2017.
Ram Rahim, the former head of the Dera Sacha Sauda sect, was convicted of raping two of his female followers in 2017. He was sentenced to 20 years of imprisonment and has been serving his sentence in Rohtak’s Sunaria jail. However, due to the Haryana government’s new Act, Ram Rahim has been able to secure repeated parole, sparking outrage among many. The fact that Ram Rahim qualifies for this provision has raised questions about the effectiveness and fairness of the law.
The Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, was enacted with the intention of providing relief to prisoners who have demonstrated good behavior during their imprisonment. The law aims to provide an opportunity for prisoners to reintegrate into society and lead a productive life. However, the provision for ‘hardcore convicted prisoners’ has been criticized for being too lenient. Many argue that prisoners like Ram Rahim, who have been convicted of heinous crimes, should not be eligible for parole, regardless of their behavior in prison.
The issue of parole for convicted prisoners is a complex one, and opinions on the matter are divided. On one hand, parole can provide an opportunity for prisoners to reform and reintegrate into society, reducing the likelihood of recidivism. On the other hand, parole can also be seen as a privilege that not all prisoners deserve, particularly those who have committed serious crimes. In the case of Ram Rahim, his conviction for rape and his subsequent sentence of 20 years of imprisonment have sparked widespread outrage. Many feel that he does not deserve the privilege of parole, regardless of his behavior in prison.
The Haryana government’s decision to enact the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, has been criticized by many. Opposition parties have accused the government of being soft on crime and prioritizing the interests of convicted prisoners over those of their victims. The fact that Ram Rahim has been able to secure repeated parole has only added fuel to the fire, with many demanding that the government take a tougher stance on crime.
In addition to the controversy surrounding Ram Rahim’s parole, the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, has also raised concerns about the potential for abuse. The law provides a significant amount of discretion to prison authorities, who can decide which prisoners are eligible for parole. This has raised fears that the law could be used to favor certain prisoners, particularly those with connections to the government or other influential individuals.
In conclusion, the Haryana government’s Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, has sparked controversy and outrage, particularly in the case of rape convict Ram Rahim. The law’s provision for ‘hardcore convicted prisoners’ to receive regular parole has been criticized for being too lenient, and Ram Rahim’s ability to secure repeated parole has only added to the controversy. As the debate surrounding this law continues, it is essential to consider the potential consequences of such legislation and ensure that the rights of victims are protected.
The Haryana government must take a closer look at the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, and consider the potential implications of its provisions. The law must be amended to ensure that it is fair and effective, and that the rights of victims are protected. The case of Ram Rahim serves as a stark reminder of the need for tough laws that prioritize the interests of victims and ensure that justice is served.
About the Author
