Would disown my son if he had Pakistan links: Assam CM
In a shocking statement, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has declared that he would disown his own son if he had any ties with Pakistan. This statement has sparked a heated debate in the country, with many questioning the severity of his words. The Chief Minister made this statement while making an apparent reference to Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi’s wife, Elizabeth, who allegedly has links with Pakistan.
The Assam CM’s statement has been seen as a bold and unapologetic stance against Pakistan, a country that has been at odds with India for decades. Sarma’s words have been met with a mix of shock, awe, and criticism, with many wondering if he would indeed follow through on his claim. The question on everyone’s mind is, what prompted the Chief Minister to make such a drastic statement?
It all started when Sarma was questioned about his stance on individuals with ties to Pakistan. In response, he stated that if his own son were to have any links with Pakistan, he would disown him. He went on to say, “If one becomes Pakistani…how can I have relation with them?” This statement has been seen as a clear indication of his strong feelings against Pakistan and its citizens.
Sarma’s statement was also seen as a veiled attack on Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi’s wife, Elizabeth, who allegedly has links with Pakistan. The Assam CM asked whether the Congress leader would have the courage to disown his wife if she indeed had ties with Pakistan. This has sparked a war of words between the BJP and the Congress, with each party trying to outdo the other in their stance against Pakistan.
The Congress has been quick to respond to Sarma’s statement, with many of its leaders questioning the validity of his claims. They have also accused the BJP of trying to politicize the issue and gain mileage out of it. On the other hand, the BJP has maintained that Sarma’s statement is a reflection of the party’s strong stance against Pakistan and its terrorist activities.
The issue of Pakistan and its ties with India has been a sensitive one for decades. The two countries have been at odds over several issues, including Kashmir, terrorism, and border disputes. The Indian government has been critical of Pakistan’s role in supporting terrorist activities in the country, and many Indians view Pakistan as a enemy state.
In this context, Sarma’s statement can be seen as a reflection of the strong anti-Pakistan sentiment that exists in India. Many Indians would agree with the Assam CM’s stance, and would indeed disown their own family members if they had ties with Pakistan. However, others have questioned the practicality of such a stance, and have argued that it is not possible to disown one’s own family members, no matter what their affiliations may be.
The debate surrounding Sarma’s statement has also raised questions about the role of family and relationships in politics. Can a politician’s personal relationships be seen as a reflection of their political affiliations? Should a politician’s family members be held accountable for their actions, even if they are not directly involved in politics?
These are complex questions that do not have easy answers. However, one thing is certain – Sarma’s statement has sparked a heated debate in the country, and has brought the issue of Pakistan and its ties with India back into the spotlight.
As the debate continues, it will be interesting to see how the situation unfolds. Will Sarma’s statement have any impact on the political landscape of the country? Only time will tell. For now, one thing is certain – the issue of Pakistan and its ties with India will continue to be a sensitive and contentious one, and will likely remain a major point of discussion in the country for years to come.
In conclusion, Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma’s statement that he would disown his son if he had ties with Pakistan has sparked a heated debate in the country. While some have praised his stance as a bold and unapologetic statement against Pakistan, others have questioned the practicality and validity of his claims. As the debate continues, it will be interesting to see how the situation unfolds, and what impact Sarma’s statement will have on the political landscape of the country.
About the Author
