Congrats on views: Dhurandhar actor Naveen on Dhruv Rathee review
The world of entertainment is no stranger to controversy, and the latest example of this is the backlash against the film “Dhurandhar”. The movie has been making headlines for all the wrong reasons, with many critics accusing it of spreading false propaganda. One of the most vocal critics of the film is YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, who recently released a video slamming the movie and its director, Aditya Dhar. However, it seems that not everyone associated with the film is taking Rathee’s criticism lying down.
In a recent interview, Naveen Kaushik, who plays the role of “Donga” in the film, responded to Rathee’s criticism. Kaushik seemed unfazed by Rathee’s accusations, stating that the YouTuber is an “opinionated person” who is entitled to his views. However, Kaushik also made it clear that he does not agree with Rathee’s assessment of the film. In a tongue-in-cheek comment, Kaushik said, “He got some views because of us, congratulations.” This statement suggests that Kaushik believes Rathee’s criticism of the film was motivated by a desire for attention and views, rather than a genuine concern for the movie’s content.
Rathee’s criticism of “Dhurandhar” is not surprising, given his history of speaking out against films and individuals that he believes are promoting false propaganda. In his video, Rathee accused Aditya Dhar of being a “propagandist” who is using his platform to spread misinformation and promote a particular ideology. Rathee also claimed that the film is part of a larger trend of movies that are being made to promote a specific agenda, rather than to tell a genuine story.
While Kaushik’s response to Rathee’s criticism may come across as dismissive, it is worth noting that the actor is not alone in his defense of the film. Many others associated with “Dhurandhar” have also spoken out against Rathee’s criticism, arguing that the film is a work of fiction that should not be taken as a factual representation of events. They also point out that the movie is intended to entertain, rather than to promote a particular ideology or agenda.
The controversy surrounding “Dhurandhar” is a reminder that the world of entertainment is often a highly polarized and politicized space. Films and TV shows are increasingly being seen as vehicles for promoting particular ideologies or agendas, and critics like Rathee are quick to call out those that they believe are crossing the line. However, it is also worth noting that the freedom to create and express oneself is a fundamental right, and that artists and filmmakers should be allowed to tell the stories that they want to tell, without fear of censorship or retribution.
Ultimately, the controversy surrounding “Dhurandhar” will likely continue to simmer, with both sides dug in and refusing to back down. However, as Kaushik’s comment suggests, it is possible that the controversy is also driving attention and views to the film, which could ultimately benefit the movie’s box office performance. As the old saying goes, “all publicity is good publicity”, and it remains to be seen whether the controversy surrounding “Dhurandhar” will ultimately help or hurt the film in the long run.
In conclusion, the debate over “Dhurandhar” is a complex and multifaceted one, with both sides presenting valid arguments. While Rathee’s criticism of the film is understandable, Kaushik’s response highlights the need for artists and filmmakers to be allowed to create and express themselves without fear of censorship or retribution. As the controversy continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how the film performs at the box office, and whether the attention surrounding it will ultimately benefit or harm the movie.
About the Author
