Can’t deny 26/11: ‘Dhurandhar’ actor Danish on Hrithik’s review
The recent release of the film ‘Dhurandhar’ has sparked a lot of debate and discussion, particularly with regards to its portrayal of politics. One of the actors in the film, Danish Pandor, who plays the role of Uzair Baloch, has responded to a review by Hrithik Roshan, in which the latter expressed his disagreement with the film’s politics. Danish Pandor’s response has shed some light on the thought process behind the film’s portrayal of sensitive topics, and it’s worth exploring in more detail.
According to Danish Pandor, the politics in the film are “research-backed elements” that are based on real-life events. He specifically mentioned the 26/11 attack, which is a pivotal moment in the film, and said, “Even if you take into consideration the 26/11 attack, you can’t deny that it happened.” This statement highlights the fact that the film is not shying away from portraying sensitive and controversial topics, but rather, it’s trying to spark a conversation about them.
The 26/11 attack, which occurred in 2008, was a devastating terrorist attack that shook the entire nation. It’s a topic that is still widely discussed and debated today, and it’s not surprising that the film ‘Dhurandhar’ would touch upon it. By including this event in the film, the makers are attempting to spark a conversation about the complexities of terrorism and the impact it has on society.
Hrithik Roshan’s review, in which he expressed his disagreement with the film’s politics, has sparked a lot of debate. While some people have praised the film for its bold portrayal of sensitive topics, others have criticized it for being insensitive and biased. Danish Pandor’s response to Hrithik’s review is a nuanced one, and it highlights the fact that the film is not trying to take a particular stance or promote a specific ideology.
Instead, the film is trying to present a realistic portrayal of the complexities of politics and terrorism. By including research-backed elements and real-life events, the makers are attempting to create a sense of authenticity and realism. This approach is not unique to ‘Dhurandhar’, as many films in recent years have attempted to tackle sensitive topics in a similar way.
The fact that Hrithik Roshan disagreed with the film’s politics is not surprising, given the subjective nature of the topic. Politics is always a sensitive and controversial topic, and it’s not uncommon for people to have differing opinions. However, Danish Pandor’s response highlights the fact that the film is not trying to promote a particular ideology or agenda, but rather, it’s trying to spark a conversation about the complexities of politics and terrorism.
In recent years, there has been a trend of films tackling sensitive topics in a more realistic and nuanced way. Films like ‘Uri: The Surgical Strike’ and ‘Hotel Mumbai’ have attempted to portray real-life events in a realistic and authentic way, and they have been praised for their bold and unflinching portrayal of sensitive topics. ‘Dhurandhar’ is another example of this trend, and it’s clear that the makers are trying to create a sense of realism and authenticity.
The inclusion of the 26/11 attack in the film is a significant one, and it’s not surprising that Danish Pandor would mention it in his response to Hrithik Roshan’s review. The attack was a devastating moment in Indian history, and it’s still widely discussed and debated today. By including it in the film, the makers are attempting to spark a conversation about the complexities of terrorism and the impact it has on society.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ and its portrayal of politics is a complex and nuanced one. While some people have praised the film for its bold and realistic portrayal of sensitive topics, others have criticized it for being insensitive and biased. Danish Pandor’s response to Hrithik Roshan’s review highlights the fact that the film is not trying to promote a particular ideology or agenda, but rather, it’s trying to spark a conversation about the complexities of politics and terrorism.
The fact that the film includes research-backed elements and real-life events, such as the 26/11 attack, is a significant one. It highlights the fact that the makers are attempting to create a sense of authenticity and realism, and they are not shying away from portraying sensitive and controversial topics. As Danish Pandor said, “You can’t deny” that the 26/11 attack happened, and it’s clear that the film is trying to spark a conversation about the complexities of terrorism and the impact it has on society.
About the Author
