Can’t deny 26/11: ‘Dhurandhar’ actor Danish on Hrithik’s review
The world of Bollywood is no stranger to controversy, and the latest film to spark debate is ‘Dhurandhar’. The movie has been making headlines for its portrayal of sensitive topics, including politics and terrorism. One of the actors in the film, Danish Pandor, who plays the role of Uzair Baloch, has responded to a review by none other than Hrithik Roshan. The ‘War’ actor had expressed his disagreement with the politics depicted in the film, prompting Danish to weigh in on the matter.
According to Danish, the politics in ‘Dhurandhar’ are backed by research, and the film’s portrayal of real-life events, such as the 26/11 attack, is undeniable. “This is very subjective…As far as political aspect goes, these are all research-backed elements. Even if you take into consideration the 26/11 attack, you can’t deny that it happened,” he said. The 26/11 attack, which occurred in 2008, was a devastating terrorist attack that shook the nation, and its impact is still felt today.
Hrithik Roshan, known for his thoughtful and nuanced opinions, had expressed his disagreement with the film’s politics, sparking a debate about the role of politics in cinema. While Hrithik’s review was met with appreciation from some quarters, others felt that he was being overly critical. Danish Pandor’s response, however, highlights the importance of research and authenticity in filmmaking.
The ‘Dhurandhar’ actor’s statement also raises questions about the responsibility of filmmakers to portray sensitive topics with accuracy and respect. In an industry where creative liberties are often taken, it’s refreshing to see a film that prioritizes research and authenticity. By acknowledging the complexity of the issues depicted in the film, Danish Pandor shows a maturity and understanding of the subject matter that is commendable.
It’s also worth noting that the 26/11 attack is a highly sensitive topic, and any depiction of it in a film is bound to be met with scrutiny. The attack, which was carried out by Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists, resulted in the loss of hundreds of lives and had a profound impact on the nation. Any film that attempts to portray this event must do so with the utmost respect and sensitivity, and it’s clear that the makers of ‘Dhurandhar’ have taken this responsibility seriously.
The debate surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ and its politics is a timely reminder of the power of cinema to spark important conversations. While opinions may vary, it’s clear that the film has struck a chord with audiences and has prompted a necessary discussion about the role of politics in filmmaking.
In conclusion, Danish Pandor’s response to Hrithik Roshan’s review highlights the importance of research and authenticity in filmmaking. By acknowledging the complexity of the issues depicted in ‘Dhurandhar’, the actor shows a maturity and understanding of the subject matter that is commendable. The film’s portrayal of sensitive topics, including the 26/11 attack, is a testament to the power of cinema to spark important conversations and challenge our assumptions.
As the debate surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ continues, it’s clear that the film has left a lasting impact on audiences. While opinions may vary, one thing is certain – the film has sparked a necessary conversation about the role of politics in filmmaking, and for that, it must be commended.
About the Author
