Can’t deny 26/11: ‘Dhurandhar’ actor Danish on Hrithik’s review
The world of Bollywood is never short of controversies, and the latest one to make headlines is the disagreement between Hrithik Roshan and the makers of the film ‘Dhurandhar’ over the politics depicted in the movie. Recently, Hrithik Roshan expressed his disagreement with the film’s politics, which sparked a debate among fans and critics alike. Now, Danish Pandor, who plays the role of Uzair Baloch in the film, has responded to Hrithik’s review, shedding light on the research that went into the making of the film.
According to Danish, the politics in the film are research-backed elements, and the makers have tried to stay true to the facts. When asked about Hrithik’s comment, Danish said, “This is very subjective…As far as the political aspect goes, these are all research-backed elements. Even if you take into consideration the 26/11 attack, you can’t deny that it happened.” The 26/11 attack, which is also known as the Mumbai terror attack, was a series of coordinated terrorist attacks that took place in Mumbai on November 26, 2008. The attack, which was carried out by a group of terrorists from Pakistan, resulted in the loss of hundreds of lives and left the city in a state of shock.
Danish’s response to Hrithik’s comment is a clear indication that the makers of the film have done their research and are confident about the politics depicted in the movie. The film, which is a thriller, explores the world of terrorism and the politics surrounding it. By incorporating real-life events like the 26/11 attack, the makers have tried to add an element of authenticity to the story.
It’s not uncommon for Bollywood films to spark controversy, especially when it comes to politics. Many films have been criticized for their portrayal of certain communities or events, and some have even been accused of promoting a particular ideology. However, in the case of ‘Dhurandhar’, the makers seem to have taken a more nuanced approach, relying on research and facts to tell the story.
Hrithik Roshan’s comment about disagreeing with the film’s politics has sparked a debate among fans, with some agreeing with his views and others disagreeing. While some have praised Hrithik for speaking his mind, others have criticized him for not understanding the context of the film. The debate has also raised questions about the role of politics in Bollywood films and whether filmmakers should be allowed to express their opinions freely.
In recent years, Bollywood has seen a surge in films that tackle complex issues like terrorism, corruption, and social injustice. These films have not only sparked important conversations but have also provided a platform for filmmakers to express their opinions and perspectives. While some films have been praised for their bold approach, others have been criticized for their handling of sensitive topics.
The controversy surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ is a reminder that Bollywood films have the power to spark important conversations and debates. By tackling complex issues and incorporating real-life events, filmmakers can create movies that are not only entertaining but also thought-provoking. However, it’s also important for filmmakers to be responsible and sensitive when dealing with sensitive topics, ensuring that they do not offend or misrepresent certain communities or events.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ and its politics is a complex one, with different opinions and perspectives emerging. While Hrithik Roshan has expressed his disagreement with the film’s politics, Danish Pandor has defended the film, citing research and facts as the basis for the story. As the debate continues, it’s essential to remember that Bollywood films have the power to spark important conversations and debates, and filmmakers should be allowed to express their opinions freely.
The controversy surrounding ‘Dhurandhar’ is a reminder that Bollywood is not just about entertainment; it’s also about sparking important conversations and debates. As the film continues to generate buzz, it will be interesting to see how the debate unfolds and whether the film’s politics will continue to be a topic of discussion.